alex goldman wrote:
> VC wrote:
>>b. car(cons(X,Y), X). If it's Lisp, the expression does not make sense.
>>If it's a Prolog 'functor', it does not make any sense either.
> In the future, please add qualifiers like "to me" to silly statements like
> the above. Car of a cons, consisting of X and Y, is X.
But what is car(cons(X,Y),X)? That looks like it's feeding
car two things, namely cons(X,Y) and X. I understand car eats
a list and spits out the first element of the list, but
have no idea what it does with a pair of objects.
Received on Sat May 14 2005 - 09:34:09 CDT
