Re: b+ tree implementation question
From: <chr1701_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 20 Jan 2005 12:55:57 -0800
Message-ID: <1106254556.981189.180560_at_f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Date: 20 Jan 2005 12:55:57 -0800
Message-ID: <1106254556.981189.180560_at_f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
DBMS_Plumber wrote:
> Don't have pointers from children to parents.
that's my conclusion, too. but i don't like it because then i have to
rewrite the whole thing... it's tricky enough and i was happy that it
worked so far :)
and so far i was not able to figure out how to do it without these
pointers...
Received on Thu Jan 20 2005 - 21:55:57 CET