Re: MS SQL 2000

From: Kirby <kirbykn_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 18 Jan 2005 06:40:50 -0800
Message-ID: <1106059250.547557.316710_at_c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>

Hugo,

Thanks for your help on this. Could you tell me under what circumstances my current code won't work. I run both what you did and what I did and they return the same results. Will I run into problems at the end of the year?

I am going to use the code you suggested because it just seems cleaner. I am just curious as to under what circumstances my version will fail. Thanks

Kirby Received on Tue Jan 18 2005 - 15:40:50 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Marshall Lucas: "Contextual or Latent Semantic Analysis"
Previous message: Martin Maney: "Table design question - variant record[sic], etc."
In reply to: Hugo Kornelis: "Re: MS SQL 2000"
Next in thread: lahuard_at_gmail.com: "Re: OT: DVD of the year?"
Reply: Hugo Kornelis: "Re: MS SQL 2000"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message