Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?
From: Neo <neo55592_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 30 Nov 2004 10:48:53 -0800
Message-ID: <4b45d3ad.0411301048.4a23356b_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 30 Nov 2004 10:48:53 -0800
Message-ID: <4b45d3ad.0411301048.4a23356b_at_posting.google.com>
> It seems to me at first sight that
> 1) RM with simple types
> 2) RM with complex types
> are indistiguishable at the logical level.
What is a type? What distinguishes simple from complex? Received on Tue Nov 30 2004 - 19:48:53 CET