Re: funny article

From: Laconic2 <laconic2_at_comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 03:51:51 -0500
Message-ID: <toKdnZUUbLc8qTHcRVn-pA_at_comcast.com>

"Anne & Lynn Wheeler" <lynn_at_garlic.com> wrote in message news:uvfbo5p90.fsf_at_mail.comcast.net...

> xml is much of a return to the *ML direction of the early 70s
> .... used for describing the document elements as opposed to simply
> describing the formating of document elements.

"Those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it." -- George Santayana. Received on Tue Nov 30 2004 - 09:51:51 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Rene de Visser: "Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?"
Previous message: Vinodh Kumar P: "Relationships as a table"
Maybe in reply to: Mikito Harakiri: "funny article"
In reply to Anne & Lynn Wheeler: "Re: funny article"
Next in thread: Rene de Visser: "Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message