Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted

From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_at_ncs.es>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 13:48:02 GMT
Message-ID: <41a5e28f.4367484_at_news.wanadoo.es>

On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:53:40 +0100, "Ja Lar" <ingen_at_mail.her> wrote:

>
>"Alfredo Novoa" <anovoa_at_ncs.es> ...
>
>> A relation is not a set of values ...
>You can have it that way. Meanwhile, I'll move on to more meaningful issues

Good idea.

Regards Received on Thu Nov 25 2004 - 14:48:02 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted"
Previous message: Tony Andrews: "Re: Normalize until neat, Automate until Complete"
Maybe in reply to: Costin Cozianu: "1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted"
In reply to Ja Lar: "Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted"
Next in thread: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message