Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted
From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_mail.ocis.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:19:34 -0800
Message-ID: <ouc9q05bri548h3m1r4qfpnhlb4q04go6t_at_4ax.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:19:34 -0800
Message-ID: <ouc9q05bri548h3m1r4qfpnhlb4q04go6t_at_4ax.com>
"Ja Lar" <jalar_at_nomail.com> wrote:
>"Gene Wirchenko" <genew_at_mail.ocis.net> skrev i en meddelelse
>news:lt67q0pokl855h84hep2u1f59fntj01g4m_at_4ax.com...
>> "Ja Lar" <ingen_at_mail.her> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> >conclusions" - eg. establish some formel basis for understanding the GB's
>> >(as D&D gives none).
>>
>> Why not ask him (Date)? You can reach him through the
>> dbdebunk.com Website.
>
>I'm sure you can imagine the answer you get there. I know it!
I would just be guessing.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices.Received on Wed Nov 24 2004 - 17:19:34 CET