Re: OT: Neos redundacy
From: Alan <alan_at_erols.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:06:22 -0500
Message-ID: <3075igF2unq0mU1_at_uni-berlin.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 16:06:22 -0500
Message-ID: <3075igF2unq0mU1_at_uni-berlin.de>
"Tom Ivar Helbekkmo" <tih+nr_at_eunetnorge.no> wrote in message
news:86wtwh5z5h.fsf_at_athene.i.eunet.no...
> "Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> writes:
>
> >> Could we just short-circuit the whole thing by telling "Neo" that the
> >> semantics of its "XDb" is a brain-damaged version of Prolog, and that
> >> spending some time studying that language might be a good idea?
> >
> > That's been tried.
>
> Yup. By me. Could we try it again? ;-)
>
But that would be redundant and therefore not normal :) Received on Fri Nov 19 2004 - 22:06:22 CET