Re: Issues with the logical consistency of The Third Manifesto
From: Marshall Spight <mspight_at_dnai.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 07:01:30 GMT
Message-ID: <dBhmd.102104$R05.62118_at_attbi_s53>
> I don't care whether you follow Codd or Date or Dawn or Neo, it's all
> representation.
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 07:01:30 GMT
Message-ID: <dBhmd.102104$R05.62118_at_attbi_s53>
"Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net> wrote in message news:zdqdneWfr8Q8xwrcRVn-vg_at_comcast.com...
>
> I don't care whether you follow Codd or Date or Dawn or Neo, it's all
> representation.
This sentence really struck me. It's almost poetry.
"Neo": new "Dawn": the first instant of sunlight "Date": a specific day
"In the beginning, there was nothing. And on the first day, there was light. Then came ..."
What? A fish? The relational model?
Is the relational model somehow piscine?
http://images.google.com/images?q=cod
Marshall Received on Tue Nov 16 2004 - 08:01:30 CET