Re: Relational vs network vs hierarchic databases
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:31:37 +0100
Message-ID: <cn9lvf$puk$1_at_news.net.uni-c.dk>
"Jan Hidders" <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be> skrev i en meddelelse
news:5dRld.23331$b97.1155131_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be...
> Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> > Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be> wrote:
> >>Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> >>
> >>>"Dan" <guntermann_at_verizon.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Without looking at this link I can tell what exactly this article will
say
> >>>
> >>>
>
>>>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>about the orthogonality of the ISA and memory architecture. It does
not
> >>>>mean that the two are totally independent. It means that there is as
much
> >>>>independence as there can be.
> >>>>
> >>>>Drop the airs.
> >>>
> >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>>
> >>> These statements are incompatible for one person, barring
> >>>inconsistency or hypocrisy.
> >>
> >>Give me a break! Next to being rather well-informed Dan is one of the
> >>most honest and patient participants in this newsgroup which is usually
> >>filled to the brim with people that have a particular axe to grind.
> >
> > And he can not have one to grind, too? His statement was an
> > unfair swipe.
>
> I respectfully disagree. Let's leave it at that.
I, for my part, offers my apologies to Dan. I had no compelling reason to
comment ironically on his comment (although I, like Gene, found it unfair).
It didn't add anything of substance.
I leave it here.
Received on Mon Nov 15 2004 - 08:31:37 CET