Re: Demo: Things in Hierarchies (w/o RM/SQL)

"Hugo Kornelis" <hugo_at_pe_NO_rFact.in_SPAM_fo> wrote in message news:bujio0h1fo7ml0uaoi2kgn1h1fiujii0ai_at_4ax.com...
> On 3 Nov 2004 10:03:46 -0800, Neo wrote:
>
> (snip)
> >I DO assert your RM Sol#1 and #2 failed the challenge because they
> (snip)
> >Please show that Neo is a cheater, by meeting the challenge and
> (snip)
>
> Yadda yadda yadda. We've been over this countless times; I have no urge at
> all to repeat that again.
>
> In case anyone is still interested in this debate, they can follow the
> link I provided, have a cup of coffee and read all the 275 messages we
> (and several others) exchanged on this subject. Then, everyone can decide
> for him- or herself what's true: my statement that I met the challenge and
> you attempted to change the rules afterwards, or your statement that I
> failed to meet the challenge.

And, for the record, I don't think anyone on the list thought Neo was in the right in refusing to pay Hugo the dollars after Hugo clearly met the challenge. I'm surprised he is willing to post in this forum again since most of us are no longer willing to listen after that episode. --dawn

> Best, Hugo
> --
>
> (Remove _NO_ and _SPAM_ to get my e-mail address)
Received on Thu Nov 04 2004 - 03:13:24 CET