Re: Ad Hominem and Thumbs down.

From: Dawn M. Wolthuis <dwolt_at_tincat-group.comREMOVE>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 11:17:25 -0600
Message-ID: <cmb3s4$f47$1_at_news.netins.net>


"Kenneth Downs" <firstinit.lastname_at_lastnameplusfam.net> wrote in message news:ov0bmc.d42.ln_at_192.168.10.210...
> Laconic2 wrote:
>
> >
> > "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.comREMOVE> wrote in message
> > news:cm98l6$jpe$1_at_news.netins.net...
> >
> >> I'd agree NOW, but that is a significant departure from the list when I
> >> started posting. Thanks to folks like Marshall S, laconic2, mAsterdam,
> > erk,
> >> celko, Jan H, Wol, Bill H, and many others, this is now a good place to
> >> chat. Cheers! --dawn
> >
> > I agree with what you say, but I would add two names to the list of
people
> > who have improved the tone around here:
> > Kenneth Downs and Dawn Wolthuis.
>
> shucks.

Ditto. And there isn't anyone I intentionally left off the list -- I was just trying to think back to some months ago when the flavor of the list changed. Gene and other ardent relational theorists have also been much more civil than the list was when I first chimed in, all of which is appreciated.

I also like mAsterdam's start at a glossary and hope we can make some progress on that front so we can perhaps help with some amount of progress in the profession.
Cheers! --dawn Received on Wed Nov 03 2004 - 18:17:25 CET

Original text of this message