Re: By The Dawn's Normal Light

From: Dawn M. Wolthuis <dwolt_at_tincat-group.comREMOVE>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:13:56 -0500
Message-ID: <clovil$o4b$1_at_news.netins.net>


"Kenneth Downs" <firstinit.lastname_at_lastnameplusfam.net> wrote in message news:1fuolc.gsf.ln_at_mercury.downsfam.net...
> erk wrote:
>
> >> Good answer. But I would also like to see the language of the
> > database
> >> and the language of data that is not-persisted be the same;
> > constraints
> >> used by the database and those used by the UI be the same; etc.
> >
> > I agree completely. I think UIs and reports need more than relations;
> > for example, ordering. But I my coding would be drastically shorter and
> > much more expressive if I had relational structures and constraints for
> > my "business logic". And those are useful on all tiers.
> >
>
> What do you mean by this? Do you mean storing biz logic in tables like a
> CASE or RAD tool might do?

Yes. It need not be tables, but some way for the biz logic to be available to the full range of tiers in an application. --dawn

> --
> Kenneth Downs
> Use first initial plus last name at last name plus literal "fam.net" to
> email me
Received on Wed Oct 27 2004 - 22:13:56 CEST

Original text of this message