| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly
"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message news:<rVIcd.267691$D%.111425_at_attbi_s51>...
> "Christopher Browne" <cbbrowne_at_acm.org> wrote in message news:2tgmgeF1v44fjU1_at_uni-berlin.de...
> > Exactly. > >
IBM training manuals. so there!!!
What design considerations
> changed from SGML to XML?
a bit simplified. but still, Presentation. from XML came (or is coming) XHTML. the weenies, mostly java (who *still* don't understand RDBMS) are trying to turn it into a universal data widget. even storage. the mob may win. usually does. well, unless the Supreme Court was appointed by your Daddy and his Friends.
> >
> > The DOM API in Java is one of the worst Java APIs I have ever > seen. (The only thing worse is the Advanced Imaging API.) It > doesn't even use Java strings, fer cryin' out loud! JDOM at > least is a "native Java" API. > > But it's still intrinsically hard to make a good API for it, because > the underlying abstraction is so poor. Why are there both > attributes and nested tags? What's this about CDATA? How > do we negotiate character encoding? Does whitespace matter > or doesn't it? > > > MarshallReceived on Mon Oct 18 2004 - 08:42:37 CDT
![]() |
![]() |