Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch"
From: Kenneth Downs <firstinit.lastname_at_lastnameplusfam.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 08:22:43 -0400
Message-ID: <jec3kc.l7g.ln_at_mercury.downsfam.net>
> that
> support
> who
> that it
> it
>
> You'd lose that dollar. Oracle doesn't do dirty reads at all:
>
>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 08:22:43 -0400
Message-ID: <jec3kc.l7g.ln_at_mercury.downsfam.net>
Tony Andrews wrote:
>> > I look forward to it. As I have said before, I know for a fact
> that
>> > your approach wouldn't work 100% for Oracle (which doesn't even
> support
>> > dirty reads), but I can't be so sure about other DBMSs. >> >> I have not used Oracle yet seriously, but considering most colleagues
> who
>> have tell me it can "everything", I would be willing to be a dollar
> that it
>> can somehow do it by another name. For instance, DB/2 calls it a >> "non-repeatable read", which name is self-explanatory, though perhaps
> it
>> should have been called "potentially non-repeatable read."
>
> You'd lose that dollar. Oracle doesn't do dirty reads at all:
>
>
So admitted. Do I send it to your favorite charity? :)
-- Kenneth Downs Use first initial plus last name at last name plus literal "fam.net" to email meReceived on Thu Oct 07 2004 - 14:22:43 CEST