Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch"
From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_mail.ocis.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 18:37:04 -0700
Message-ID: <2f39m0hn35ejs117nberlcsah3ckfs916m_at_4ax.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 18:37:04 -0700
Message-ID: <2f39m0hn35ejs117nberlcsah3ckfs916m_at_4ax.com>
Kenneth Downs <firstinit.lastname_at_lastnameplusfam.net> wrote:
[snip]
>The current arbitrary feature for this case, which did not seem worth
>mentioning in that post, is that you can specify a suffix to affix to the
>columns in the child table. So for two foreign keys to the same table one
>is suffixed "_parent" and one suffixed "_child". This makes me really
>uneasy though, I keep thinking "salesperson1", "salesperson2", etc...
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices.Received on Thu Oct 07 2004 - 03:37:04 CEST