Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch"
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 22:24:21 -0500
Message-ID: <cjqfp9$ooc$1_at_news.netins.net>
"Alfredo Novoa" <alfredo_at_ncs.es> wrote in message
news:e4330f45.0410031901.6756b51b_at_posting.google.com...
> fredrik_bertilsson_at_passagen.se (Fredrik Bertilsson) wrote in message
news:<31f7e57d.0410030640.7cd0ee99_at_posting.google.com>...
>
> > > The Relational Model exists, the OO Model don't exist.
> >
> > Yes, the OO database model does not exist (or is just a copy of the
> > network model), but the OO programming model does indeed exists. And
> > it has a lot of benefits, even if it is not possible to use
> > everywhere.
>
> It does not make sense to say that there is a mismatch between a
> database model and a programming model. They are completely different
> kinds of "model".
They don't have to be. Both are used for data handling. Facts are handled by programming languages and databases alike. The interface to data values could be the same for data stored in primary storage and data stored in secondary storage. --dawn Received on Mon Oct 04 2004 - 05:24:21 CEST