Re: Specifying all biz rules in relational data
From: Kenneth Downs <firstinit.lastname_at_lastnameplusfam.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:24:34 -0400
Message-ID: <2pnqic.44v.ln_at_mercury.downsfam.net>
>
> What excuse do they have for batch processing
> for anything beyond garbage collecting, reporting
> and [end|start]-of-[day|week|month|year]
> aggregation?
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:24:34 -0400
Message-ID: <2pnqic.44v.ln_at_mercury.downsfam.net>
mAsterdam wrote:
> robert wrote:
>> ... the batch processing >> COBOL folk will simply not allow even 3rd normal form structures. they >> simply don't chew as fast as VSAM flat files for that kind of processing.
>
> What excuse do they have for batch processing
> for anything beyond garbage collecting, reporting
> and [end|start]-of-[day|week|month|year]
> aggregation?
Marketing databases benefit greatly from batch processing, as I would imagine would any largely static database.
-- Kenneth Downs Use first initial plus last name at last name plus literal "fam.net" to email meReceived on Wed Sep 22 2004 - 04:24:34 CEST