Re: On view updating
From: Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:10:59 GMT
Message-Id: <pan.2004.09.20.23.14.09.192920_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>
>
> I supose It means "translate".
>
> I don't follow you. The ONLY IF part is redundant and only puts more
> emphasis.
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:10:59 GMT
Message-Id: <pan.2004.09.20.23.14.09.192920_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:12:23 -0700, Alfredo Novoa wrote:
> Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be> wrote in message
> news:<pan.2004.09.18.21.34.55.114875_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>...
>> > --- >> > I therefore have come to believe that "view updateability" should be >> > allowed to happen IF AND ONLY IF the system has PRECISELY ONE WAY to >> > "resolve" the user's request. >> > --- >> >> It depends of course on what you mean by "resolve"
>
> I supose It means "translate".
Yes. Agreed. But not everybody agrees on what the right translation is and that sometimes matters.
>> but for most >> reasonable interpretations that I can think of the ONLY IF part is >> widely accepted by almost everybody who has done any serious research >> on the view update problem. The IF part is an entirely other matter and >> certainly not obvious, as you may remember from the discussions with >> Jens Lechtenboerger.
>
> I don't follow you. The ONLY IF part is redundant and only puts more
> emphasis.
> It is the "uniqueness criterion" of the slides that you posted a link
> some time ago.
That's only the ONLY IF part. Btw. I didn't post that link, I only said I liked it very much and that doesn't count. :-)
- Jan Hidders