Re: Specifying all biz rules in relational data
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 23:04:28 +0200
Message-ID: <414df464$0$42417$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
>
> a problem is that real world knowledge can quickly become a mesh
> .... while something like NLN's UMLS of medical knowledge has
> some hierarchical orginaization ... it also has MeSH organization
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 23:04:28 +0200
Message-ID: <414df464$0$42417$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote:
> mAsterdam writes:
>>It looks like taxonomy is closely associated with hierarchies. Not >>really a problem, is it?
>
> a problem is that real world knowledge can quickly become a mesh
> .... while something like NLN's UMLS of medical knowledge has
> some hierarchical orginaization ... it also has MeSH organization
[snip nice links]
Heh. It seems IT has a lot of work to do to get the basics right. Does anybody know a reference for a (start of a) classification of datatypes beyond the realm of one language? Received on Sun Sep 19 2004 - 23:04:28 CEST