Re: Relational Completeness

From: Marshall Spight <mspight_at_dnai.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 03:13:15 GMT
Message-ID: <fJN2d.209851$mD.194083_at_attbi_s02>

"Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net> wrote in message news:z7adnUmJndRlEdbcRVn-gA_at_comcast.com...
>
> Sorry for the digression.

That's a pretty cool digression, actually.

I've programmed PDP-11 assembly for school, but never for work. I did a fair bit of Z80 as a kid. Later I did some x86 assembly in some plugins for Adobe Premiere.

Anyway, do you have any thoughts on the original question?

Marshall Received on Sat Sep 18 2004 - 05:13:15 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Laconic2: "Re: Relational Completeness"
Previous message: Laconic2: "Re: Relational Completeness"
Maybe in reply to: Marshall Spight: "Relational Completeness"
Next in thread: Laconic2: "Re: Relational Completeness"
Reply: Laconic2: "Re: Relational Completeness"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message