Re: Separate foreign keys with shared ID space

From: Marshall Spight <mspight_at_dnai.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 17:39:55 GMT
Message-ID: <LPQOc.63922$eM2.25470_at_attbi_s51>

"Christian Antognini" <christian.antognini_at_trivadis.com> wrote in message news:410affcf$1_at_post.usenet.com...
>
> A PK should have no business meaning.

Says who? Can you justify this statement?

Marshall Received on Sat Jul 31 2004 - 19:39:55 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Christopher Browne: "Re: Separate foreign keys with shared ID space"
Previous message: Tony: "Re: Date's updatable view rules"
Maybe in reply to: Robert Brown: "Separate foreign keys with shared ID space"
In reply to Christian Antognini: "Re: Separate foreign keys with shared ID space"
Next in thread: Christopher Browne: "Re: Separate foreign keys with shared ID space"
Reply: Christopher Browne: "Re: Separate foreign keys with shared ID space"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message