Re: A Normalization Question

From: Ralph Becket <rafe_at_cs.mu.oz.au>
Date: 31 Jul 2004 05:12:15 -0700
Message-ID: <3638acfd.0407310412.70ff3aa8_at_posting.google.com>


neo55592_at_hotmail.com (Neo) wrote in message news:<4b45d3ad.0407301140.3949ae68_at_posting.google.com>...
> > > Please help Neo owe Hugo $1000 by using RM Sol#1 or #2 to create the
> > > hierarchal reports for the following without NULLs or redundancy:
> >
> > I really don't know why I'm bothering even trying, but...
>
> Please post your solution in original thread "Nearest Common Ancestor
> Report (XDb1's $1000 Challenge)". I will respond there why Hugo's
> solutions (although not as normalized, generic or fast as XDb1's) were
> significantly more appropriate than yours.

Oh, good grief. I was right: I shouldn't have bothered. Received on Sat Jul 31 2004 - 14:12:15 CEST

Original text of this message