Re: A Normalization Question

• Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****

"Neo" <neo55592_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4b45d3ad.0407171339.1e15daf8_at_posting.google.com...
> > No matter how many times his errors are
> > pointed out and explained, he will NOT get it, because he KNOWS he is
> > the only person who really understands and that we are all wrong, so
> > he will not listen.

> I only contend that 'brown' stored three time via the logical layer of
> a relational db is logically redundant, subject to update anomaly and
> can be normalized. No one's has yet proved otherwise to me.

You keep saying "stored" and "logical" together. You keep saying that 'brown' is a "thing" and not a "reference".

Prove us that brown is logically stored three times in RM and not in XDb. (whatever that means)
Prove us that brown is a "thing" and not a "reference". You have not yet proved this to us.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

• Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=