Re: A question for Mr. Celko
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 10:45:13 GMT
Message-ID: <ZwsKc.8796$gt1.7642_at_nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
"Jan Hidders" <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.07.18.10.12.22.935425_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be...
> On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 00:12:27 +0000, Marshall Spight wrote:
> > "Jan Hidders" <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be> wrote in message
> > news:pan.2004.07.17.23.23.54.257337_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be...
> >> On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:37:00 +0000, Marshall Spight wrote:
> >> >
> >> > [...] 1NF doesn't seem to do anything but get in the way of things
> >> > like relation-valued or list-valued attributes.
> >>
> >> Good question. I would argue that it keeps things simple. [...]
> >
> > I hypothesize that you can have list-valued-attributes inline (as is
> > already often the case with strings) and relation-valued attributes
> > implemented as separate relations, and still keep things quite simple.
> > I'm still investigating this, though.
>
> So what happens for example if the list is really big and I do a join
> between the list and the relation in the relation-valued attribute. Will
> your query optimizer recoginize that situation and choose the right join
> algorithm?
This would be trivial to figure out for anyone that can give a light and formal introduction to XQuery. ;-)
Do you know how hard it is to decide whether a certain list
> operation is actually a natural join?
>
> -- Jan Hidders
>
- Dan Received on Sun Jul 18 2004 - 12:45:13 CEST