Re: A Normalization Question
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:35:52 -0700
Message-ID: <HzyJc.30$K9.231_at_news.oracle.com>
"Tony" <andrewst_at_onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
news:c0e3f26e.0407150147.108c951f_at_posting.google.com...
> This thread is futile, because Neo is that strange oxymoron, the
> intelligent idiot. I mean, it must take some intelligence to come up
> with this weird and self-consistent "data model" of his; and yet he
> completely fails to grasp the most rudimentary principles of data.
> Yet Neo's conceit is that ONLY he trully understands data, and
> EVERYONE else is wrong. No matter how many times his errors are
> pointed out and explained, he will NOT get it, because he KNOWS he is
> the only person who really understands and that we are all wrong, so
> he will not listen.
Every established scientific discipline has cranks. Before, I was surprised database theory didn't appear to have any. Received on Thu Jul 15 2004 - 18:35:52 CEST