Re: A Normalization Question

From: x <x-false_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:46:49 +0300
Message-ID: <40f3f5e7$1_at_post.usenet.com>


  • Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****

"Neo" <neo55592_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4b45d3ad.0407121454.7662fcd6_at_posting.google.com...
> > Once you understand why we normalize you will understand why the notion
of
> > redundancy is defined in database theory as it is and why multiple
> > occurrences of the same string in a data structure are not
> > necessarily redundant.

> Multiple occurances of the same string is necessarily redundant. It
> requires a limited data model and definitions to obscure this fact.

You should give an example with multiple occurences of quantities. Like "this box is 1 cm thick, 1 kg heavy and cost only 1$"

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

  • Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Received on Tue Jul 13 2004 - 16:46:49 CEST

Original text of this message