Re: A Normalization Question

From: Neo <neo55592_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 12 Jul 2004 20:23:28 -0700
Message-ID: <4b45d3ad.0407121923.11a81cc_at_posting.google.com>


> Sure, you can represent it that way, even in the relational model, but
> you cannot call it normalization because normalization deals with removing
> logical redundancies and there were no logical redundancies in the
> original relation to begin with. I know you keep on denying this but
> that's what the definition of logical redundancy says.

You may be correct by your limited definitions, but having the same thing (ie a person, color, street, string or symbol) multiple times in one db is redundant. Received on Tue Jul 13 2004 - 05:23:28 CEST

Original text of this message