Re: A Normalization Question
From: Marshall Spight <mspight_at_dnai.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 16:21:16 GMT
Message-ID: <0CzHc.23237$WX.15287_at_attbi_s51>
> Why would it ever be necessary to change the 'r' in brown? If it was necessary
> to have another thing spelled 'clown,' shouldn't the correct approach be to
> create the new thing 'clown' in the thing table and point to the new 'thing?'
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 16:21:16 GMT
Message-ID: <0CzHc.23237$WX.15287_at_attbi_s51>
"VHarris001" <vharris001_at_aol.com> wrote in message news:20040709084350.29796.00001157_at_mb-m18.aol.com...
>
> Why would it ever be necessary to change the 'r' in brown? If it was necessary
> to have another thing spelled 'clown,' shouldn't the correct approach be to
> create the new thing 'clown' in the thing table and point to the new 'thing?'
Marshall Received on Fri Jul 09 2004 - 18:21:16 CEST