Re: A Normalization Question
From: Alan <not.me_at_uhuh.rcn.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 02:15:48 GMT
Message-ID: <o72Hc.10259$Xb4.7234_at_nwrdny02.gnilink.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 02:15:48 GMT
Message-ID: <o72Hc.10259$Xb4.7234_at_nwrdny02.gnilink.net>
"Neo" <neo55592_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4b45d3ad.0407071719.64e06d5a_at_posting.google.com...
> > That's on old version, maybe 12 years old. They are up to 4th Ed. now.
>
> The general form of normalization hasn't changed in the last 12 years
> and won't change in the next 12 years. Different data models (ie based
> on lists, trees, tables, cubes, etc) will each have some unique xNFs,
> but all of them will be a subset of the general form of normalization.
Yes, but they've re-explained it in a way that even might get through to you. Received on Thu Jul 08 2004 - 04:15:48 CEST