Re: Counting propositions

From: x <>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:31:48 +0300
Message-ID: <40d85df1$>

"Mikito Harakiri" <> wrote in message news:DPYBc.18$
> "Paul" <> wrote in message
> news:CFWBc.19053$
> > Isn't "select count(*)" a similar thing? You should explicitly name the
> > data columns you want. If you change the candidate keys it may change
> > the whole interpretation of the propositions. In which case it may no
> > longer be true that you want to count propositions.
> Count is unusual aggregate operator. Every other aggregate operator is
> associated with a binary operation. Indeed, the SUM is iterative
> of "+", the MAX is iterative application of "max(x,y)" (or CASE ...).
> are few exceptions like AVG, but they can be viewed as redundant (or at
> least less fundamental) operators.

 SUM(),MAX(),AVG() apply to a bag of values.

> What operation COUNT is application of? The increment, of course. Unlike
> examples above, the increment is unary operation, so the COUNT shouldn't
> really have an argument!

COUNT() apply to a bag of values.


  • - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Received on Tue Jun 22 2004 - 18:31:48 CEST

Original text of this message