Re: In an RDBMS, what does "Data" mean?
From: Dawn M. Wolthuis <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 21:46:02 -0500
Message-ID: <c9onpq$fqf$1_at_news.netins.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 21:46:02 -0500
Message-ID: <c9onpq$fqf$1_at_news.netins.net>
"Mike Preece" <michael_at_preece.net> wrote in message
news:1b0b566c.0406031839.4f9b7846_at_posting.google.com...
> Sorry for the delayed response.
>
> "Mike Nicewarner" <psyclo_at_nospam_datamodel.org> wrote in message
news:<c82ulk$gcl$1_at_news.netins.net>...
<snip>
> I'm thinking back to a previous thread in this ng where the fact that
> relationships between data can be implied by their physical proximity
> in a Pick database. It makes good sense logically to physically store
> data in context. Never mind Codd's wallop.
And popping up one level on that, since I let others care about the physical storage, it makes sense to logically model data in context as well. Cheers! --dawn. Received on Fri Jun 04 2004 - 04:46:02 CEST