Re: 2NF Controversy
From: Troels Arvin <troels_at_arvin.dk>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 20:23:40 +0200
Message-ID: <pan.2004.05.30.18.23.39.462060_at_arvin.dk>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 20:23:40 +0200
Message-ID: <pan.2004.05.30.18.23.39.462060_at_arvin.dk>
On Sun, 30 May 2004 09:19:01 -0400, Laconic2 wrote:
> If a column did not depend on the key at all, the table would not be in
> 1NF.
?
As far as I know, 1NF mandates that
- values be scalar (i.e. without any meaningful sub-components)
- the base relations cannot have repeating groups.
-- Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, DenmarkReceived on Sun May 30 2004 - 20:23:40 CEST