Normalization and DBMS

From: x <x-false_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 18:35:42 +0300
Message-ID: <40a0f206$1_at_post.usenet.com>


Codd 1970 ACM paper:
"A first-order predicate calculus suffices if the collection of relations is
in normal form."
"Such a language would provide a YARDSTICK of linguistic power for all other
proposed data languages."

Someone claimed in this group that normalization is not "good" . How powerful is the data language of an (existing) DBMS not based on
"normalization" ?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

  • Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Received on Tue May 11 2004 - 17:35:42 CEST

Original text of this message