Re: MV counterexample

From: Laconic2 <laconic2_at_comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 10:09:13 -0400
Message-ID: <C-qdnf_mH5pR2wfdRVn-sA_at_comcast.com>

This is off topic, but anyway:

You mentioned "di-graphs". In the original Codd article, he compares the data model he is proposing to the "graph and network models" . I'm assuming that di-graph and graph boil down to the same thing. Is that so? Or is there something more I need to learn about di-graphs? Received on Thu May 06 2004 - 16:09:13 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Len Silverston's Universal Data Models sanity"
Previous message: Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra: "Re: Peter Chen and Charles Bachman"
Maybe in reply to: Karel Miklav: "MV counterexample"
Next in thread: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Len Silverston's Universal Data Models sanity"
Reply: x: "Re: MV counterexample"
Reply: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Re: MV counterexample"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message