Re: Relational Model and Search Engines?
Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 19:43:00 -0300
Message-ID: <pan.2004.05.03.22.43.00.128555_at_dutra.fastmail.fm>
Just realised it's become offtopic... sorry...
Em Mon, 03 May 2004 22:23:56 +0000, Nick Landsberg escreveu:
> In-memory access does not have to go across any bus to any
> device. When you are dealing with 8,000 TPS this does have an
> effect.
So does caching.
> Commits are done to the disk, as usual (to the journal
> file). Depending on the application, these may be either synchronous
> (right now), or deferred until the next millisecond or the next 10
> commits or something like that. If you can live with losing the
> last 10 transactions in case of a crash, you can live with an
> in-memory database. (It's a tradeoff.)
So, it is basically for throwaway data. I was hoping for something more interesting.
-- Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra +55 (11) 5685 2219 Av Sgto Geraldo Santana, 1100 6/71 +55 (11) 5686 9607 04.674-000 São Paulo, SP BRASIL http://br.geocities.com./lgcdutra/Received on Tue May 04 2004 - 00:43:00 CEST