Re: c.d.theory lexicon overview
From: Senny <sennomo_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:45:19 GMT
Message-ID: <jfOhc.1325$17.155573_at_news1.epix.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:45:19 GMT
Message-ID: <jfOhc.1325$17.155573_at_news1.epix.net>
Laconic2 wrote:
> Refs unforms. Double plus ungood.
I get the reference, but not your point.
Incidentally, Newspeak would be horrible for terminology because it has an overwhelming amount of homonymity.
Quack.
--Senny Received on Thu Apr 22 2004 - 13:45:19 CEST