Re: Date's First Great Blunder

From: Laconic2 <laconic2_at_comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:40:21 -0400
Message-ID: <EsadnYfYjbB-Ihvd4p2dnA_at_comcast.com>

> If NULLs are not necessary and increase complexity too much, why
> doesn't Date drop the chapter on NULL/Missing Information?
>

Ahhh! I can see it now!

(This chapter intentionally left blank)

What a commentary on NULLs that would make! Received on Wed Apr 21 2004 - 20:40:21 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Neo: "Re: Date's First Great Blunder"
Previous message: Laconic2: "The Network Data Model"
Maybe in reply to: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Date's First Great Blunder"
In reply to Neo: "Re: Date's First Great Blunder"
Next in thread: Neo: "Re: Date's First Great Blunder"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message