Re: why do you apply undo before redo?
From: Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:44:14 GMT
Message-ID: <OKXgc.78459$FK6.5316747_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be>
>
>
> I think you mis-spelled 'atomicity'. (Could be you misspelled
> 'atomicity/durability', also.)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:44:14 GMT
Message-ID: <OKXgc.78459$FK6.5316747_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be>
Paul G. Brown wrote:
> Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be> wrote in message news:<Cwzgc.76768$nU5.5168180@phobos.telenet-ops.be>...
>
> [ snip ]
>
>
>>Of course most concurrency control mechanisms that guarantee >>serializability would prevent that.
>
>
> I think you mis-spelled 'atomicity'. (Could be you misspelled
> 'atomicity/durability', also.)
Hmm, no, I don't think so. Isolation is a sufficient condition.
- Jan Hidders