Re: Objects and messages
From: Timothy J. Bruce <uniblab_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 15 Apr 2004 16:54:15 -0700
Message-ID: <34519632.0404151554.1351c70d_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 15 Apr 2004 16:54:15 -0700
Message-ID: <34519632.0404151554.1351c70d_at_posting.google.com>
Laconic2:
Since there is no *FORMAL* definition of `object', I'm sticking with
the philosophical sense: Something intelligible or perceptible by the
mind.
This means a message could be an object.
Unless you meant `object' as an intransitive verb,
Timothy J. Bruce
uniblab_at_hotmail.com
</RANT>
Received on Fri Apr 16 2004 - 01:54:15 CEST