Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Total Cost of Ownership

Re: Total Cost of Ownership

From: Laconic2 <laconic2_at_comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 12:41:41 -0400
Message-ID: <I9mdnch8RtIHW-fdRVn-jw@comcast.com>

"Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> wrote in message news:c5ecng$khv$1_at_news.netins.net...
> Should we take another stab at it or do you think you have it nailed in
the
> purpose statement above? --dawn

Notice that I stated what the purpose of a "database" is, not what the purpose of a DBMS is. It seems to me that you can describe the purpose of a DBMS as being to enable the management of a database in a systematic manner, but I may be starting down a trail that leads nowhere, here.

Note that, in my definition, it says almost nothing about the particular technology used. In these terms, a body of data stored in a PICK file could be evaluated based on how well is preserved the value and availability of the data in the PICK file.

I also said almost nothing about whether CONSTRAINTS in a database are helpful or harmful. In one context, they might be helpful, because they prevent the coherence of the existing data from being undermined by data that violates the constraint. In another context a constraint might be harmful, because it interferes with keeping the body of data current.

So, no I don't think I nailed it, but I do think I nailed something. Received on Mon Apr 12 2004 - 11:41:41 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US