Re: Xquery might have some things right
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:08:05 -0500
Message-ID: <NYSdnTi-iIar1cfdRVn-sQ_at_golden.net>
"Mikito Harakiri" <mikharakiri_at_iahu.com> wrote in message
news:NsJ5c.24$YU2.56_at_news.oracle.com...
>
> "Hiran Chaudhuri" <hiran.chaudhuri_at_lrz.fh-muenchen.de> wrote in message
> news:c37mit$ca5$1_at_wsc10.lrz-muenchen.de...
> >
> > "Mikito Harakiri" <mikharakiri_at_iahu.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> > news:29J5c.23$YU2.103_at_news.oracle.com...
> > > "Hiran Chaudhuri" <hiran.chaudhuri_at_lrz.fh-muenchen.de> wrote in
message
> > > news:c37lhc$bno$1_at_wsc10.lrz-muenchen.de...
> > > > But as it does, we can focus our thoughts to
> > > > higher levels of abstraction, and wide-spread interoperability comes
> > into
> > > > reach.
> > >
> > > CORBA deja vu?
> >
> > Is CORBA that flexible? How come it is not that widely used then?
>
> No, XML is doomed to repeat CORBA failure.
>
> > And still, it is not the only use for XML.
>
> I don't see any utility for XML beyond cutting and pasting quotes into
> usenet messages like this:
> <quote>
> ...
> </quote>
Technically speaking, isn't the above only sgml and not necessarily xml per se? Received on Fri Mar 19 2004 - 02:08:05 CET