Re: Is this bad design ?

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_golden.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:40:29 -0500
Message-ID: <fv2dnRl3Qe-3ZM3dRVn-uQ_at_golden.net>


"ben brugman" <ben_at_niethier.nl> wrote in message news:c2qipe$1uu$1_at_reader10.wxs.nl...
>
> "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message
> news:yt2dnQ4g-dO_MM3dRVn-uA_at_golden.net...
> > "ben brugman" <ben_at_niethier.nl> wrote in message
> > news:40503104$0$6567$4d4ebb8e_at_read.news.nl.uu.net...
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > But then the application has to be changed.
> > > >
> > > > No, it doesn't. A simple view serves the application well.
> > >
> > > If a view is used (I assume a union over both tables),
> > > how does the application change the data from
> > > valid to non-valid and vice versa ?
> >
> > By updating an attribute in the view or in the base table depending on
> which
> > relvars one decides to make views and which base tables.
>
> I can not manage to change the 'valid' attribute by
> changing it in the view. Making the mother valid
> was done by creating an extra row in the solution by
> Fabian.

I really don't give a shit what Fabian wrote. Read what I wrote. Received on Fri Mar 12 2004 - 00:40:29 CET

Original text of this message