Re: object algebra
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:40:30 GMT
Message-ID: <iVE3c.22407$992.8931_at_newssvr31.news.prodigy.com>
"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message
news:4fmdnbSTrq9wG9PdRVn-uA_at_golden.net...
> "Paul Vernon" <paul.vernon_at_ukk.ibmm.comm> wrote in message
> news:c27tbf$2mg0$1_at_gazette.almaden.ibm.com...
> > "Drago Ganic" <drago.ganic_at_in2.hr> wrote in message
> > news:c1r4ku$dku$1_at_sunce.iskon.hr...
> > [snip]
> > > I do agree that we can model relations so that all attributs are "not
> > null"
> > > and work with 2VL. That is one solution (i don't think it's a
practical
> > one,
> > > because we get far to many relations in our data model).
> >
> > In theory, what's the practical limit for the number of relations in a
> > database?
>
> That's an interesting question. In practice, what's the theoretical limit?
hahahahahahaha - great!
Reminds me somewhat of: "The distance between theory and practice is always smaller in theory than in practice." - Marshall T. Rose Received on Wed Mar 10 2004 - 14:40:30 CET