Re: object algebra

From: Neo <neo55592_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 3 Mar 2004 17:14:33 -0800
Message-ID: <4b45d3ad.0403031714.59dd6db1_at_posting.google.com>

No, not joking. See www.xdb1.com/Basic/Symbol.asp, www.xdb1.com/GUI/Labels.asp and www.xdb1.com/HowTo/Find.asp

> > The exact method of normalization and to what extent is practical is
> > dependent on the data model and its implementation.
>
> No, it's dependent on neither of those.

Then how do you explain that in TDM/XDb1, things are normalized down to atomic symbols (a, b, c ...) where as a similar level of normalization in RDM is impractical? Received on Thu Mar 04 2004 - 02:14:33 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Re: object algebra"
Previous message: Neo: "Re: Tree (forest) design"
Maybe in reply to: Eric Kaun: "Re: object algebra"
In reply to Eric Kaun: "Re: object algebra"
Next in thread: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Re: object algebra"
Reply: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Re: object algebra"
Reply: Chris Hoess: "Re: object algebra"
Reply: Tony: "Re: object algebra"
Reply: Neo: "Re: object algebra"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message