Re: object algebra
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 13:23:56 GMT
Message-ID: <L%k1c.55378$TQ6.42655_at_newssvr33.news.prodigy.com>
"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_golden.net> wrote in message
news:A5adnXZUg63vJ6LdRVn-sA_at_golden.net...
> "Eric Kaun" <ekaun_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:5BO%b.18056$2%4.355_at_newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
> > "Neo" <neo55592_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:4b45d3ad.0402261256.783f8bd2_at_posting.google.com...
> > > So are you in favor of NULLs (or its patches) and the resulting weaker
> > > realtionships?
> >
> > The above isn't a "patch for" nulls. What does "weaker relationship"
mean,
> > though? I have no idea how to address that one.
>
> The last bit would be the appropriate time to cite Date's Principle of
> Incoherence.
Yeah, should have - I use that principal as the message on my marquee screen saver. So far, however, it's not getting across to many. :-) Received on Wed Mar 03 2004 - 14:23:56 CET