Re: object algebra
From: Eric Kaun <ekaun_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:12:19 GMT
Message-ID: <ToO%b.18049$0Y4.2860_at_newssvr31.news.prodigy.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:12:19 GMT
Message-ID: <ToO%b.18049$0Y4.2860_at_newssvr31.news.prodigy.com>
"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message
news:Khz%b.404982$I06.4398728_at_attbi_s01...
> "Eric Kaun" <ekaun_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:5Sq%b.50107$9W2.38111_at_newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
> >
> > See "TransRelational" for a good example of this. NO TABLES. And a
brilliant
> > implementation design.
> >
>
> Also patented, which makes it substantially less interesting,
unfortunately.
>
>
> Marshall
I don't think it makes it less interesting, and I think it will prove to be extremely useful. Of course it would be better for us if it were public-domain, but less interesting for its inventor, perhaps. Received on Fri Feb 27 2004 - 22:12:19 CET