Re: object algebra
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_golden.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:41:58 -0500
Message-ID: <kNWdnZszFrIDPaPdRVn_iw_at_golden.net>
> At the risk become boring, couldn't resist adding one more:
>
> Relational battles are nullish.
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:41:58 -0500
Message-ID: <kNWdnZszFrIDPaPdRVn_iw_at_golden.net>
"Mikito Harakiri" <mikharakiri_at_iahu.com> wrote in message
news:YDr%b.24$we5.120_at_news.oracle.com...
> "Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message
> news:L7e%b.59977$4o.81556_at_attbi_s52...
> > "Mikito Harakiri" <mikharakiri_at_iahu.com> wrote in message
> news:ila%b.29$OB.189_at_news.oracle.com...
> > >
> > > Can I suggest that
> > > CS is too much "turingish"
> >
> > That's great! I love it! I'll be using that elsewhere, you can bet.
>
> At the risk become boring, couldn't resist adding one more:
>
> Relational battles are nullish.
How about "Object battles are nebulish?" Received on Fri Feb 27 2004 - 02:41:58 CET