Re: object algebra
From: Neo <neo55592_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 26 Feb 2004 08:02:52 -0800
Message-ID: <4b45d3ad.0402260802.19fb86a5_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 26 Feb 2004 08:02:52 -0800
Message-ID: <4b45d3ad.0402260802.19fb86a5_at_posting.google.com>
> > XDb1 has transitive closure.
>
> XDb1 has "amaterish" transitive closure
Why not show how amaterish it is by providing an alternate solution? Received on Thu Feb 26 2004 - 17:02:52 CET