Re: object algebra

From: Neo <neo55592_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 24 Feb 2004 13:28:28 -0800
Message-ID: <4b45d3ad.0402241328.350b71e7_at_posting.google.com>

> > It does not require those extra tables (or any in fact).
> > See www.xdb1.com/Example/Ex102.asp
>
> The relations you describe above are WRONG

Please shows the correct relations. Received on Tue Feb 24 2004 - 22:28:28 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bob Badour: "Re: object algebra"
Previous message: Neo: "Re: object algebra"
Maybe in reply to: Jean Morissette: "object algebra"
In reply to Neo: "Re: object algebra"
Next in thread: Bob Badour: "Re: object algebra"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message